MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
ON WARHEAD ATTRIBUTION AND HEAVY BOMBER DATA RELATING TO THE
TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION ON FURTHER REDUCTION AND LIMITATION OF
STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS

Pursuant to and in implementation of the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, hereinafter referred to as the Treaty, the Parties have exchanged data current as of January 3, 1993, on the number of nuclear weapons for which each heavy bomber of a type and a variant of a type equipped for nuclear weapons is actually equipped. No later than 30 days after the date of entry into force of the Treaty, the Parties shall additionally exchange data, current as of the date of entry into force of the Treaty, according to the categories of data contained in this Memorandum, on heavy bombers equipped for nuclear weapons; on heavy bombers specified as reoriented to a conventional role, and on heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role that are subsequently returned to a nuclear role; on ICBMs and SLBMs to which a reduced number of warheads is attributed; and on data on the elimination of heavy ICBMs and on conversion of silo launchers of heavy ICBMs.

Only those data used for purposes of implementing the Treaty that differ from the data in the Memorandum of Understanding on the Establishment of the Data Base Relating to the START Treaty are included in this Memorandum.


I. Number of Warheads Attributed to Deployed Heavy Bombers Other than Heavy Bombers Reoriented to a Conventional Role

1.   Pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article IV of the Treaty each Party undertakes not to have more nuclear weapons deployed on heavy bombers of any type or variant of a type than the number specified in this paragraph. Additionally, pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article IV of the Treaty, for each Party the numbers of warheads attributed to deployed heavy bombers not reoriented to a conventional role as of the date of signature of the Treaty or to heavy bombers subsequently deployed are listed below. Such numbers shall only be changed in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article IV of the Treaty. The Party making a change shall provide a notification to the other Party 90 days prior to making such a change. An exhibition shall be conducted to demonstrate the changed number of nuclear weapons for which heavy bombers of the listed type or variant of a type are actually equipped:

(a)  
United States of America
Heavy Bomber Type
and Variant of a Type*		 Number of Warheads
 
    B-52G     12    
    B-52H     20    
    B-1B     16    
    B-2     16    

Aggregate Number of Warheads
Attributed to Deployed Heavy
Bombers, Except for Heavy Bombers
Reoriented to a Conventional Role		              
 
(b)  
Russian Federation
Heavy Bomber Type
and Variant of a Type		 Number of Warheads
 
    Bear B       1    
    Bear G       2    
    Bear H6       6    
    Bear H16     16    
    Blackjack     12    

Aggregate Number of Warheads
Attributed to Deployed Heavy
Bombers, Except for Heavy Bombers
Reoriented to a Conventional Role		              

* Heavy bombers of the type and variant of a type designated B-52C, B-52D, B-52E, and B-52F, located at the Davis-Monthan conversion or elimination facility as of September 1, 1990, as specified in the Memorandum of Understanding to the START Treaty, will be eliminated, under the provisions of the START Treaty, before the expiration of the seven-year reductions period.


II. Data on Heavy Bombers Reoriented to a Conventional Role and Heavy Bombers Reoriented to a Conventional Role that Have Subsequently Been Returned to a Nuclear Role

1.   For each Party, the numbers of heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role are as follows:

(a)  
United States of America
Heavy Bomber Type
and Variant of a Type		 Number
        _______________
        _______________
 
(b)  
Russian Federation
Heavy Bomber Type
and Variant of a Type		 Number
        _______________
        _______________

2.   For each Party, the numbers of heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role as well as data on related air bases are as follows:

(a)  
United States of America
Air Bases:
Name/Location
 
Bomber Type and
Variant of a Type
__________________  
 
Heavy Bombers Reoriented
to a Conventional Role		 Number  
______  
 
(b)  
Russian Federation
Air Bases:
Name/Location
 
Bomber Type and
Variant of a Type
__________________  
 
Heavy Bombers Reoriented
to a Conventional Role		 Number  
______  

3.   For each Party, the differences observable by national technical means of verification for heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role are as follows:

(a)  
United States of America
Heavy Bomber Type
and Variant of a Type		 Difference
        _______________
 
(b)  
Russian Federation
Heavy Bomber Type
and Variant of a Type		 Difference
        _______________

4.   For each Party, the differences observable by national technical means of verification for heavy bombers reoriented to a conventional role that have subsequently been returned to a nuclear role are as follows:

(a)  
United States of America
Heavy Bomber Type
and Variant of a Type		 Difference
        _______________
 
(b)  
Russian Federation
Heavy Bomber Type
and Variant of a Type		 Difference
        _______________


III. Data on Deployed ICBMs and Deployed SLBMs to Which a Reduced Number of Warheads Is Attributed

For each Party, the data on ICBM bases or submarine bases, and on ICBMs or SLBMs of existing types deployed at those bases, on which the number of warheads attributed to them is reduced pursuant to Article III of the Treaty are as follows:

(a)  
United States of America

Type of ICBM or SLBM
________      
Deployed ICBMS or Deployed
SLBMs, on Which the Number of
Warheads Is Reduced		________      

Warheads Attributed to Each
Deployed ICBM or Deployed
SLBM After Reduction in the
Number of Warheads on It		________      

Number of Warheads by Which
the Original Attribution of
Warheads for each ICBM or
SLBM Was Reduced		________      

Aggregate Reduction in the
Number of Warheads Attributed
to Deployed ICBMs or Deployed
SLBMs of that Type		________      

ICBM Bases at Which the Number of Warheads on Deployed ICBMs Is Reduced:

     
Name/Location
____________		 ICBM Type on Which
the Number of
Warheads is Reduced
________      
Deployed ICBMs on Which the
Number of Warheads Is Reduced		________      

Warheads Attributed to Each
Deployed ICBM After Reduction
in the Number of Warheads on
It		________      

Number of Warheads by Which
the Original Attribution of
Warheads for Each ICBM Was
Reduced		________      

Aggregate Reduction in the
Number of Warheads Attributed
to Deployed ICBMs of that
Type		________      

SLBM Bases at Which the Number of Warheads on Deployed SLBMs Is Reduced:

     
Name/Location
____________		 SLBM Type on Which
the Number of
Warheads is Reduced
________      
Deployed SLBMs on Which the
Number of Warheads Is Reduced		________      

Warheads Attributed to Each
Deployed SLBM After Reduction
in the Number of Warheads on
It		________      

Number of Warheads by Which
the Original Attribution of
Warheads for Each SLBM Was
Reduced		________      

Aggregate Reduction in the
Number of Warheads Attributed
to Deployed SLBMs of that
Type		________      

(b)  
Russian Federation

Type of ICBM or SLBM
________      
Deployed ICBMS or Deployed
SLBMs, on Which the Number of
Warheads Is Reduced		________      

Warheads Attributed to Each
Deployed ICBM or Deployed
SLBM After Reduction in the
Number of Warheads on It		________      

Number of Warheads by Which
the Original Attribution of
Warheads for each ICBM or
SLBM Was Reduced		________      

Aggregate Reduction in the
Number of Warheads Attributed
to Deployed ICBMs or Deployed
SLBMs of that Type		________      

ICBM Bases at Which the Number of Warheads on Deployed ICBMs Is Reduced:

     
Name/Location
____________		 ICBM Type on Which
the Number of
Warheads is Reduced
________      
Deployed ICBMs on Which the
Number of Warheads Is Reduced		________      

Warheads Attributed to Each
Deployed ICBM After Reduction
in the Number of Warheads on
It		________      

Number of Warheads by Which
the Original Attribution of
Warheads for Each ICBM Was
Reduced		________      

Aggregate Reduction in the
Number of Warheads Attributed
to Deployed ICBMs of that
Type		________      

SLBM Bases at Which the Number of Warheads on Deployed SLBMs Is Reduced:

     
Name/Location
____________		 SLBM Type on Which
the Number of
Warheads is Reduced
________      
Deployed SLBMs on Which the
Number of Warheads Is Reduced		________      

Warheads Attributed to Each
Deployed SLBM After Reduction
in the Number of Warheads on
It		________      

Number of Warheads by Which
the Original Attribution of
Warheads for Each SLBM Was
Reduced		________      

Aggregate Reduction in the
Number of Warheads Attributed
to Deployed SLBMs of that
Type		________      


IV. Data on Eliminated Heavy ICBMs and Converted Silo Launchers of Heavy ICBMs

1.   For each Party, the numbers of silo launchers of heavy ICBMs converted to silo launchers of ICBMs other than heavy ICBMs are as follows:

(a)  
United States of America
 
Aggregate Number of Converted Silo Launchers______
 
ICBM Base for Silo
Launchers of ICBMs:
Name/Location		 ICBM Type Installed
in a Converted
Silo Launcher
_________
 
Silo Launcher Group:   (designation)
 
_________
 
Silo Launchers
_______________
 
(b)  
Russian Federation
 
Aggregate Number of Converted Silo Launchers______
 
ICBM Base for Silo
Launchers of ICBMs:
Name/Location		 ICBM Type Installed
in a Converted
Silo Launcher
_________
 
Silo Launcher Group:   (designation)
 
_________
 
Silo Launchers
_______________

2.   For each Party, the aggregate numbers of heavy ICBMs and eliminated heavy ICBMs are as follows:

(a)  
United States of America Number

Deployed Heavy ICBMs		______

Non-Deployed Heavy ICBMs		______

Eliminated Heavy ICBMs		______
 
(b)  
Russian Federation Number

Deployed Heavy ICBMs		______

Non-Deployed Heavy ICBMs		______

Eliminated Heavy ICBMs		______


V. Changes

Each Party shall notify the other Party of changes in the attribution and data contained in this Memorandum.

The Parties, in signing this Memorandum, acknowledge the acceptance of the categories of data contained in this Memorandum and the responsibility of each Party for the accuracy only of its own data.

This Memorandum is an integral part of the Treaty and shall enter into force on the date of entry into force of the Treaty and shall remain in force so long as the Treaty remains in force. As provided for in subparagraph 2(b) of Article V of the Treaty, the Parties may agree on such additional measures as may be necessary to improve the viability and effectiveness of the Treaty. The Parties agree that, if it becomes necessary to change the categories of data contained in this Memorandum or to make other changes to this Memorandum that do not affect substantive rights or obligations under the Treaty, they shall use the Bilateral Implementation Commission to reach agreement on such changes, without resorting to the procedure for making amendments set forth in Article VII of the Treaty.


DONE at Moscow on January 3, 1993, in two copies, each in the English and Russian languages, both texts being equally authentic.


FOR THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA:		 FOR THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION: