Return to: Index of 1996 Secretary of State's Speeches/Testimonies || Electronic Research Collections Index || ERC Homepage

U.S. Department of State 
96/01/18 Secretary's Harvard University speech 
Published by the Bureau of Public Affairs 
 
 
 
                "Leadership for the Next American Century" 
 
                  Secretary of State Warren Christopher 
 
                          Address before the 
                 John F. Kennedy School of Government 
                          Harvard University 
                        Cambridge, Massachusetts 
 
                            January 18, 1996 
 
(As delivered) 
 
 
     Let me begin by thanking Joe Nye not only for giving me that warm  
introduction, but for laying to rest one persistent canard about this  
fine institution.  It used to be said in some circles that the Kennedy  
School was a plot to infiltrate the federal government.  Joe Nye's  
appointment proves that the opposite is true:  the federal government is  
in fact a plot to infiltrate the Kennedy School. 
 
     A year ago, I met with you to explain the guiding principles of  
this Administration's foreign policy and our priorities for 1995.  I am  
here today to assess a remarkable period of achievement for American  
diplomacy and to discuss our main objectives for 1996. 
 
     The end of the Cold War has given us an unprecedented opportunity  
to shape a more secure world of open societies and open markets -- a  
world in which American interests and ideals can thrive.  But we also  
face serious threats from which no border can shield us -- terrorism,  
proliferation, crime and damage to the environment. 
 
     This is not the end of history, but history in fast-forward.  Eight  
decades ago, when this century's first Balkan war ended, it took an  
international commission to piece together what had happened.  Now,  
images of violence in Sarajevo are beamed instantly around the world.   
Six decades ago, it took several years for the Great Depression to  
become a global disaster.  Now, an economic crisis in Mexico can disrupt  
the global economy in the blink of an eye. 
 
     In this time of accelerated change, American leadership must remain  
constant.  We must be clear-eyed and vigilant in pursuit of our  
interests.  Above all, we must recognize that only the United States has  
the vision and strength to consolidate the gains of the last few years,  
and to build an even better world. 
 
     Six years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, some still think that  
we can escape the problems of the world by building walls around  
America.  But the evidence of the last three years should  settle the  
debate about America's role in the world.  Because President Clinton has  
rejected the path of retreat, we have forged a record that proves the  
enduring value of American leadership and American engagement. 
 
     The President, with help from internationalists in both parties,  
has made the United States the world's driving force for peace.  Think  
of it.  Had we not led, the war in Bosnia would continue today, wasting  
innocent lives, threatening a wider war and eroding the NATO Alliance.   
Had we not led, there would not be the prospect of comprehensive peace  
in the Middle East.  And there would be scant hope for reconciliation in  
Northern Ireland. 
 
     Without American leadership, thugs would still rule in Haiti, and  
thousands of Haitian refugees would be trying to reach our shores.  The  
Mexican economy would be in free-fall, threatening our prosperity and  
harming emerging markets and the global economy.  We would not have made  
the kind of progress on the fullest possible accounting of American POWs  
and MIAs that allowed us to recognize Vietnam.  We would not have gained  
the indefinite extension of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty -- the  
most important barrier against the spread of nuclear weapons.  And North  
Korea could be building nuclear bombs. 
 
     The lesson is clear.  If we lead, we can sustain the momentum that  
defeated communism, freed us from the danger of nuclear war, and  
unfurled freedom's flag around the world.  Our strength is a blessing,  
not a burden.  President Clinton is determined to use it wisely and  
decisively. 
 
     Our strength simply cannot be maintained on the cheap.  And yet for  
a year now, the President and I have been fighting those forces in  
Congress who would cut our foreign affairs budget so deeply that we  
would have to draw back from our leadership-- closing important  
embassies, shutting down peacekeeping, and self-destructively slashing  
our international programs.  These are not responsible proposals.  They  
would weaken America precisely when we must remain strong, precisely  
when other nations are looking to us for leadership.  They betray a lack  
of appreciation for what America has accomplished in the last 50 years  
and a lack of confidence that our great nation can shape the future. 
 
     The recent shutdown of the U.S. government was particularly  
troubling to me because it eroded our international reputation for  
reliability and integrity.  In my recent travels abroad, I have been  
struck by the far-reaching consequences of the shutdown.  For leaders  
and ordinary citizens in many parts of the world, it seemed as if the  
most powerful nation in the world was closing for business.  Our failure  
to pay our bills and our employees was conduct not worthy of a great  
nation.  It must not happen again. 
 
     Three weeks ago, I was described in the pages of Newsweek as a  
"true believer that America must be involved in the world."  I plead  
guilty.  I came of age after World War II, in the years our leaders made  
the investments whose benefits all of us are reaping today.  I am not a  
politician.  But I do have a bias: for the kind of foreign policy that  
makes America a reliable and principled leader; a bias for a foreign  
policy that projects America's unique purpose and strength.  I hope that  
every candidate who aspires to the presidency will keep these important  
guideposts in mind. 
 
     Our commitment to provide leadership is the first of the central  
principles guiding our foreign policy that I outlined here last year.  A  
second principle I enunciated then is the need to strengthen the  
institutions that provide an enduring basis for global peace and  
prosperity.  These institutions, such as the United Nations, NATO, and  
the World Bank, help us to share the burdens and costs of leadership.   
This year, a top priority will be working with Congress to meet our  
financial obligations to the UN as it undertakes an essential program of  
reform. 
 
     A third principle is that support for democracy and human rights  
reflects our ideals and reinforces our interests.  Our dedication to  
universal values is a vital source of America's authority and  
credibility.  We simply cannot lead without it.  Our interests are most  
secure in a world where accountable government strengthens stability and  
where the rule of law protects both political rights and free market  
economies.  That is why we have provided such strong support for  
courageous reforms in nations like South Africa, Mexico, and the new  
democracies of Central Europe.  That is why we are so pleased that there  
have been sixteen inaugurations following free elections in this  
hemisphere in the three years we have been in office.  This year,  
another important goal will be to help the War Crimes Tribunals  
establish accountability in the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda for two of  
the greatest tragedies of this decade. 
 
     A fourth principle is the critical importance of constructive  
relations with the great powers.  These nations -- our allies in Europe  
and Japan, as well as Russia and China -- have the greatest ability to  
affect our security and prosperity. 
 
     In the last few years, some have said that the United States and  
Europe would inevitably drift apart.  We have proved them wrong.  Our  
common action in Bosnia has dramatically reinforced the transatlantic  
alliance and has opened new prospects for lasting European security  
cooperation.  And the New Transatlantic Agenda agreed by the United  
States and the European Union in Madrid last month will not only expand  
our economic ties but enhance coordination on political and security  
challenges around the world. 
 
     With Japan, we are also putting each pillar of our alliance --  
security, economic, and political -- on a sound basis.  A year-long  
review of our relationship, which Joe Nye led with Assistant Secretary  
Winston Lord, has revitalized our security ties.  We have reached 20  
market access agreements which have contributed to the recent sharp  
decline in our bilateral trade deficit. 
 
     We have also pursued our interest in strengthening our cooperation  
with Russia and China, at a time when both countries are undergoing  
difficult transitions. 
 
     From the beginning of his Administration, President Clinton has  
recognized that only by engaging with Russia could we protect our  
national interests.  Our strategy has produced concrete benefits for the  
security of the American people.  We have achieved massive reductions in  
nuclear arsenals and made nuclear materials more secure.  By working  
with Russia, we have advanced our goals of peace in Bosnia and the  
Middle East. 
 
     Of course, it is easy to enumerate our differences with Russia,  
such as on nuclear cooperation with Iran and the war in Chechnya.  This  
week's events provide more evidence that the current military approach  
in Chechnya will only deepen that war.  The cycle of violence can end  
only through negotiations. 
 
     But as I have said before, I do not have the luxury of making a  
list of differences with Russia and then walking away.  My job is to  
build areas of agreement and to develop policies to manage our  
differences. 
 
     Back in 1993 in my first major speech as Secretary of State, I  
observed that Russia's struggle to transform itself would be long and  
hard, and that success was by no means assured.  That remains my  
judgment today.  On the plus side, four years into the post-Soviet  
period, Russia's economy is increasingly governed by market principles.   
Free elections, unthinkable a few years ago, are becoming a fact of  
life.  But Russia has not yet overcome the ruinous legacy of seven  
decades of communism -- a legacy visible in crime, corruption, and  
poverty. 
 
     Recent events reflect troubling signs of Russian reform under  
strain.  The Russian people face an important choice in the June  
Presidential election.  In the final analysis, only they can choose  
their leaders and determine their future.  Our obligation -- the  
American obligation -- is to promote democratic values and democratic  
institutions and to pursue our national interests at all times. 
 
     When I meet with new Russian Foreign Minister Primakov, I will tell  
him that the United States is determined to continue working with Russia  
on the many common challenges we face.  I will, however, make it clear  
that Russia's integration with the institutions of the West, which is in  
our mutual interest, depends on Russia's willingness to abide by  
international norms and to stay on the path of reform.   
 
     Turning to China, we also have a profound stake in helping to  
ensure that that powerful nation pursues its modernization in ways that  
contribute to the overall security and prosperity of the region -- for  
our own sake and in the interest of our key allies and friends.  That is  
why we are pursuing a strategy of engagement.  It is designed to  
integrate China into the international community and to enhance our  
cooperation on such common problems as the North Korean nuclear program,  
drug trafficking and alien smuggling. 
 
     We continue to have important differences with China on such issues  
as human rights, proliferation and trade.  In recent months we have come  
through a rocky period in our relations with China.  The United States  
is ready to restore positive momentum to our relationship.  We have  
reaffirmed our "one-China" policy and we reject the short-sighted  
counsel of those who seek to isolate or contain China.  China's  
President has said that his country, too, seeks a positive relationship.   
Let me be clear:  The United States will do its part, but if we are to  
build a lasting, productive relationship, China has a responsibility to  
take meaningful steps to address areas of our concern and to respect  
internationally accepted principles. 
 
     In the coming year, we will give special emphasis to three main  
objectives:  first, pursuing peace in regions of vital interest to the  
United States; second, confronting the new transnational security  
threats; and third, promoting open markets and prosperity.  
 
     A year ago, the war in Bosnia was the greatest unresolved problem  
we faced.  Nothing is yet assured in Bosnia of course.  But by joining  
the use of force to diplomacy, we have transformed a situation some  
considered hopeless into one in which rebuilding, reconciliation, and  
justice are all possible.   The President's visit to our troops last  
week reminded us again of the uncommon spirit and confidence they bring  
to their mission. 
 
     The peace agreement we forged in Dayton means that we can look  
beyond four years of horror -- the concentration camps, the ethnic  
cleansing, the hunger and death.  In 1996, our immediate challenge is to  
implement the military and civilian aspects of the Dayton agreement.  We  
expect all parties to comply fully with their obligations under that  
carefully negotiated agreement. 
 
     It is important to recognize that success in Bosnia will also have  
broad implications for our goal of an integrated Europe at peace.  Our  
actions in Bosnia have proven that NATO is here to stay as the guarantor  
of transatlantic security.  Without NATO's action, it is clear this war  
would continue today. 
 
     The very nature of the coalition we have forged and are leading in  
Bosnia has historic implications.  This is the first time that soldiers  
from every power and region of Europe will serve in the same military  
operation.  Russians and Lithuanians, Greeks and Turks, Poles and  
Ukrainians, British, Germans and French, have joined with Americans and  
Canadians to share the same risks, under the same flag, to achieve the  
same noble goal.  As we help overcome the divisions of Bosnia, we also  
help overcome the division of Europe itself. 
 
     The mission in Bosnia will give some of our new partners in the  
Partnership for Peace a chance to show that they can meet the challenges  
of membership in an enlarged NATO Alliance.   The process of enlargement  
is already making NATO a force for stability and democracy in the east.   
We have made it clear to our partners that to gain NATO membership, they  
must consolidate democratic reforms, place their armed forces under firm  
civilian control, and resolve disputes with their neighbors. 
 
     It is in central and eastern Europe that the greatest threats to  
European security -- ethnic conflict, proliferation, and poverty -- must  
be faced.  That is why it would be irresponsible to lock out half of  
Europe from the structures that ensure security and prosperity on the  
continent.  That is why the European Union is moving forward with its  
own plans to add members.  NATO enlargement should proceed on roughly a  
parallel track.  
 
     We recognize that as Russia redefines its international role, NATO  
enlargement must proceed in a gradual, deliberate and transparent way.   
But Russia should understand that the Alliance with which it is working  
so closely in Bosnia does not threaten its security.  Indeed, we  
continue to encourage Russia to construct a long-term, special  
relationship with NATO. 
 
     In the Middle East, American leadership is also indispensable.   
Today, for the first time in half a century, we stand on the threshold  
of ending the Arab-Israeli conflict.  A comprehensive peace between  
Israel and its immediate neighbors, and indeed with the entire Arab  
world, is no longer a dream, but a realistic possibility. 
 
     I have just returned from my 16th trip to the region.  Last week I  
was with King Hussein of Jordan on the day he dedicated a trauma unit to  
the late Prime Minister Rabin -- it's hard to believe, but that was in a  
hospital in Tel Aviv.  Few events more vividly capture how much the  
landscape of the region has changed.   What is more, in just two days,  
almost a million Palestinians will vote in the first free elections in  
the West Bank and Gaza. 
 
     Now we must work to complete the circle of peace in the Middle  
East.  The key lies in achieving a breakthrough between Israel and  
Syria.  Both sides believe the United States is critical to this effort.   
Under our auspices, Israel and Syria are now holding intensive  
negotiations on Maryland's eastern shore.  Although there is much work  
still to be done, we are crossing important thresholds and we seek an  
agreement in 1996.  The United States is determined to help complete  
this historic task. 
 
     We will also continue our efforts to resolve conflicts and build  
security in other regions.  We will pursue initiatives in places such as  
Northern Ireland, Haiti, Cyprus, Angola, Burundi, Peru and Ecuador.  We  
will strengthen the foundations of peace and security in the Asia- 
Pacific region by deepening our security cooperation with our treaty  
allies, and through our participation in the very promising ASEAN  
Regional Forum.  And in this hemisphere, we will build on the new level  
of political cooperation we achieved at the Summit of the Americas in  
Miami.   
 
     Our second major area of focus this year is to continue to take on  
new challenges to global security.  As the President emphasized in a  
landmark UN speech last October, transnational threats like  
proliferation, terrorism, international crime, drugs, and environmental  
damage threaten all of us in our interdependent world. 
 
     We will continue working to stop the spread of weapons of mass  
destruction, the gravest potential threat to the United States and our  
allies.  Thirty-three years ago, the nuclear powers took what President  
Kennedy called a "step backward from the shadows of war" by signing the  
Limited Test Ban Treaty.  Now we must complete a Comprehensive Test Ban  
Treaty in time to sign it this year.  And this year we must ratify the  
Chemical Weapons Convention.  
 
     We must also lock in deep reductions in the nuclear arsenals of the  
United States and the countries of the former Soviet Union.  I urge the  
Senate and the Russian Duma to ratify the START II Treaty, which will  
remove an additional 5,000 warheads from the arsenals of our two  
countries. 
 
     Our regional nonproliferation efforts are also vital.  It is  
critical that North Korea's nuclear program stays shut down and on the  
way to the scrap heap.  And pariah states like Iraq, Iran and Libya must  
be stopped in their efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction.  The  
information that UN inspectors have uncovered on Iraq's biological  
program is chilling.  It is now clear that Saddam Hussein possessed  
biological weapons and was on the verge of using them against civilians  
in the Gulf War.  These revelations are an urgent reminder that Saddam  
remains a menace and that sanctions against Iraq must be maintained. 
 
     President Clinton has also put the fight against international  
criminals, terrorists and drug traffickers at the center of our foreign  
policy.  We are determined to continue our drive to put such  
international predators out of business.  We have taken unprecedented  
steps against the Cali cartel and many of its leaders are now behind  
bars.  We will continue to deny terrorists and drug kingpins access to  
their assets; we will put decisive pressure on governments that tolerate  
such organizations; and we will step up operations attacking crime and  
drugs at their source. 
 
     Protecting our fragile environment also has profound long-range  
importance for our country, and in 1996 we will strive to fully  
integrate our environmental goals into our diplomacy -- something that  
has never been done before.  We will seek further reductions in  
greenhouse gases and press for Senate approval of conventions on  
biodiversity and the Law of the Sea.  Working closely with the Vice  
President, I have also focused on how we can make greater use of  
environmental initiatives to promote larger strategic and economic  
goals.  That means, for example, encouraging joint water projects in the  
Middle East, increasing environmental cooperation with our global  
partners, and helping our environmental industries capture a larger  
share of a $400 billion global market. 
 
     The third element of our agenda is to build on the economic  
achievements that will be a lasting legacy of the Clinton  
Administration.  President Clinton's personal leadership on NAFTA, the  
Uruguay Round, APEC and the Summit of the Americas, has made the United  
States the hub of an increasingly open global trading system.  This  
year, our watchword is implementation -- making sure that the trade  
commitments and agreements we have reached produce concrete  
opportunities so that American companies and workers can compete abroad  
on a level playing field.  In the Asia-Pacific region through APEC, with  
the European Union through the Transatlantic Marketplace, and in this  
Hemisphere through the Miami process, we are removing barriers to trade  
and investment and opening markets for U.S. exports.  We also remain  
committed to obtaining fast-track authority to negotiate Chile's  
accession to NAFTA. 
 
     As this presidential election year begins, we are hearing once  
again from those who preach the dangerous gospel of protection and  
isolation.  America and the world went down that road in 1930s -- and  
our mistake fueled the Great Depression and helped set the stage for the  
Second World War.  Shutting America off from the world would be just as  
reckless today as it was six decades ago.  As President Clinton said at  
the beginning of his Administration, "we must compete, not retreat." 
 
     Ladies and gentlemen, everywhere I go, I find that the nations of  
the world look to America as a source of principled and reliable  
leadership.  They see American soldiers bridging rivers and moving  
mountains to help peace take hold in Bosnia.  They see us working for  
peace in the Middle East and for security in Korea.  They see us  
negotiating trade agreements so that every nation can find reward in  
emerging markets.  They see the most powerful nation on earth standing  
up for persecuted peoples everywhere, because we believe it is right and  
because those who struggle for freedom represent the future. 
 
     The world sees us as an optimistic people, motivated by a broad  
view of our interests and driven by a long view of our potential.  They  
follow us because they understand that America's fight for peace and  
freedom is the world's fight.  At the end of the American century,  
President Clinton is determined that we continue to act in the highest  
traditions of our nation and our people.   
 
     The President's answer to the voices of isolationism is clear.  We  
can no more isolate our nation from the world than we can isolate our  
families from our neighborhoods, or our neighborhoods from our cities.   
As a global power with global interests, retreat is not a responsible  
option for the United States.  We must continue to lead.  If we do, the  
end of this millennium can mark the start of a second American century. 
 
     Thank you very much. 
To the top of this page