U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF THE SPOKESMAN JANUARY 25, 1995 SECRETARY OF STATE CHRISTOPHER STATEMENT BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, FINANCE AND URBAN AFFAIRS January 25, 1995 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I welcome this opportunity to join Secretary Rubin and Chairman Greenspan in supporting urgent congressional approval of the U.S. government's proposed loan guarantee package for Mexico. As you know, it is somewhat rare for me to appear before this committee. But I consider my appearance here this morning to be a direct exercise of my responsibility as the President's principal foreign policy adviser. The plain fact is that the United States has a fundamental national interest in making sure that financial confidence in Mexico is restored. Our immediate aim is to help Mexico overcome its short- term liquidity crisis so it can turn its attention back to economic reform and growth. But the package is about far more than Mexico's economic future. It is about American leadership, in this hemisphere and beyond. It is about American jobs, the security of our borders, and the future of trade and economic cooperation in our hemisphere. Most fundamentally, it is about stability in a nation in which the United States has a vital strategic stake as our close neighbor, and a vast economic interest as our third largest trading partner. Today I want to highlight the fundamental foreign policy and national security interests that are served by acting now. First and foremost, America has an immense economic and political stake in Mexico's stability. If we support Mexico by providing this loan guarantee package, President Zedillo will be better able to implement his plan to keep Mexico on the path of steady economic growth and reform and to regain investor confidence. If we fail to act decisively now, American investment to Mexico will be imperiled. American exports -- now $40 billion a year -- will diminish. And many of the 700,000 American jobs those exports support could be jeopardized. By helping Mexico restore financial liquidity and investor confidence, the package will enhance its government's ability to control inflation and to sustain the growth necessary for stability and reform. Without our support, Mexico could be hobbled economically. Its society could come under increasing strain. Its progress toward reform could be stifled and even reversed. In the short term, economic distress and political instability in Mexico could add to the pressure that already pushes thousands of illegal immigrants across the 2,000-mile border that we share. A Mexican financial crisis could cause additional social, economic and law enforcement problems along our entire southern border. Indeed, our determined efforts to control illegal immigration could be overwhelmed. Moreover, Mexico's capacity to cooperate with us on a range of other issues -- from narcotics trafficking and money laundering to the environment -- could be severely strained. Over the long term, such instability would drain American resources and undermine our ability to cooperate with all our neighbors to meet these threats. Second, approval of this loan guarantee package will have far- reaching implications for the prosperity and stability of Latin America and of emerging market economies around the world. Already, reverberations from the peso devaluation have been felt in many countries where sound market reforms have been rewarded by accelerated economic growth and increased foreign investment -- and where American firms have gained new opportunities. Mexico's crisis, if left unaddressed, can disrupt other emerging economies at similar stages of development. It is essential that Mexico's crisis be ended so that the remarkable progress toward open trade and investment in this hemisphere and beyond is sustained. Third and perhaps most important, this is a test of American leadership. By extending this package to Mexico, the United States will demonstrate its unwavering commitment to lead this hemisphere toward stability and prosperity -- a commitment we reaffirmed at the Summit of the Americas six weeks ago. Only the United States has the capacity to offer this leadership. Mr. Chairman, over the past decade we have witnessed a remarkable transformation of this hemisphere. Where once country after country stagnated under military rule, today we are a hemisphere of 34 democracies. Where once economy after economy was caught in the grip of closed markets, choking debt and hyperinflation, today this is the second fastest growing region in the world and the fastest growing regional market for American exports. It would be an historic miscalculation to stand aside and watch that progress falter in a nation of 90 million people across our border. The triumph of democracy and open markets in our hemisphere is certainly reflected in Mexico's experience over the last few years. Let us not forget that the Mexico of today is not the Mexico of the early Eighties. A decade ago the response to a similar crisis in Mexico might have been very different: a return to statist policies, nationalization of key sectors, the imposition of trade barriers to American products. Mexico has embarked on an historic process of democratic and market reform that President Zedillo is committed to extend. It is essential that this delicate process not be damaged or reversed by economic and social instability. Like many members of Congress, the Clinton Administration has both immense hopes and serious concerns about Mexico that go well beyond the specific issues involved in this crisis. Mexico has many complex problems that will not be solved immediately. Its current liquidity crisis, however, must be solved immediately. If it is not, we will have little hope of helping Mexico to continue meeting the long-term challenge of modernizing its economy, strengthening its democracy, and addressing the environmental, labor and immigration issues that affect both of our nations. We must resist the temptation to load up the loan guarantee package with conditions unrelated to the urgent matter at hand. By encumbering a package vital to the health of the Mexican economy, such conditions could undermine their own intended goal of encouraging further reform in Mexico. As former President Bush urged last week, this measure "should be considered in the Congress on its financial merits. The Congress should not attach extraneous political considerations to this legislation." President Clinton is determined to work with members of both parties to keep this measure focused on solving this crisis now. Mr. Chairman, my fundamental responsibility is to help the President safeguard the national security and vital interests of the United States. But in addition, I have been an observer of American politics, and I know that for many members of both parties, this will be a difficult vote. I also know that at every moment in our national life when America's vital interests have been at stake, Congress has put aside partisan differences and put national security first. As Secretary of State, I ask you to do that again. For in this case, our interests are crystal clear. If Mexico's liquidity crisis is allowed to undermine its stability, America's security and prosperity will be put at risk. That is why it is imperative that we do the right thing -- and that we do it right away. Thank you very much. (###)To the top of this page